Enteric fever cluster identification in South Africa using genomic surveillance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi.

The National Institute for Communicable Diseases in South Africa participates in national laboratory-based surveillance for human isolates of Salmonella species. Laboratory analysis includes whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of isolates. We report on WGS-based surveillance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (Salmonella Typhi) in South Africa from 2020 through 2021. We describe how WGS analysis identified clusters of enteric fever in the Western Cape Province of South Africa and describe the epidemiological investigations associated with these clusters. A total of 206 Salmonella Typhi isolates were received for analysis. Genomic DNA was isolated from bacteria and WGS was performed using Illumina NextSeq technology. WGS data were investigated using multiple bioinformatics tools, including those available at the Centre for Genomic Epidemiology, EnteroBase and Pathogenwatch. Core-genome multilocus sequence typing was used to investigate the phylogeny of isolates and identify clusters. Three major clusters of enteric fever were identified in the Western Cape Province; cluster one (n=11 isolates), cluster two (n=13 isolates), and cluster three (n=14 isolates). To date, no likely source has been identified for any of the clusters. All isolates associated with the clusters, showed the same genotype (4.3.1.1.EA1) and resistome (antimicrobial resistance genes: bla TEM-1B, catA1, sul1, sul2, dfrA7). The implementation of genomic surveillance of Salmonella Typhi in South Africa has enabled rapid detection of clusters indicative of possible outbreaks. Cluster identification allows for targeted epidemiological investigations and a timely, coordinated public health response.

Laboratory-acquired infections of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi in South Africa: phenotypic and genotypic analysis of isolates.

BACKGROUND: Workers in clinical microbiology laboratories are exposed to a variety of pathogenic microorganisms. Salmonella species is among the most commonly reported bacterial causes of laboratory-acquired infections. We report on three cases of laboratory-acquired Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi (Salmonella Typhi) infection which occurred over the period 2012 to 2016 in South Africa. METHODS: Laboratory investigation included phenotypic and genotypic characterization of isolates. Phenotypic analysis included standard microbiological identification techniques, serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Genotypic analysis included the molecular subtyping methodologies of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis, multilocus sequence typing and whole-genome sequencing (WGS); with WGS data analysis including phylogenetic analysis based upon comparison of single nucleotide polymorphism profiles of isolates. RESULTS: All cases of laboratory-acquired infection were most likely the result of lapses in good laboratory practice and laboratory safety. The following critical issues were highlighted. There was misdiagnosis and misreporting of Salmonella Typhi as nontyphoidal Salmonella by a diagnostic laboratory, with associated public health implications. We highlight issues concerning the importance of accurate fluoroquinolone susceptibility testing and interpretation of results according to updated guidelines. We describe potential shortcomings of a single disk susceptibility screening test for fluoroquinolone susceptibility and suggest that confirmatory minimum inhibitory concentration testing should always be performed in cases of invasive Salmonella infections. These antimicrobial susceptibility testing issues resulted in inappropriate ciprofloxacin therapy which may have been responsible for failure in clearance of pathogen from patients. Salmonella Typhi capsular polysaccharide vaccine was not protective in one case, possibly secondarily to a faulty vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular subtyping of isolates proved effective to investigate the genetic relatedness of isolates. Molecular subtyping data interpreted together with epidemiological data allowed us to pinpoint the most likely sources for our cases of laboratory-acquired infection.